Website Cookies

We use cookies to make your experience better. Learn more on how here

Accept

How can understanding human decision-making influence solutions to big challenges?


How we think about human-decision making influences the solutions proposed to life’s big challenges: including how to create equitable, diverse and inclusive workplaces.


This 2024 article by Madsen and colleagues, provides a discussion of how our underlying assumptions of human behaviour influence the design and delivery of behaviour change interventions.


The authors argue that inaccurate assumptions can result in interventions that are either ineffective or have unintended consequences.


They propose that some scientists and policy makers argue that humans are predictably irrational and therefore design interventions from this start point.


The authors suggest that rather than assume irrationality, we should start from the assumption that humans are reasonable. They define reasonable to mean that when people have knowledge of the situation (including social pressures), they can see the behaviour as a satisfactory way to achieve a particular goal.


For example, the adoption of beliefs commonly regarded as irrational can be modelled as a reasonable consequence of how experiences in different social environments shape who can be trusted.


Therefore according to the authors, the solution is to understand explanations for behaviour based on people’s goals and social environments and engage participants as partners and not just targets of interventions.


Critically, assuming people are reasonable:


• Refocuses our attention to how trust can be earned and maintained.
• Shifts the focus to different questions and solutions.
• Does not imply that all behaviour is ethical or socially acceptable.


Implications for organisations


In the context of EDI, assumed reasonableness might lead us to ask:


Given the evidence that it is good for business, the social pressure to take action and it is ethically the right thing to do, why might senior leaders hold back from investing in creating more inclusive organisations?

Answering this question from within the context of your organisation might start to help you to understand what needs to happen to create the change you are seeking.


More generally, when designing behaviour change interventions, the authors suggest:

  1. Nudge participants to reflect on whether the suggested change in behaviour aligns with their values or goals.
  2. Enable participatory engagement at different stages of an intervention, including during the design and prior to launch.

You can access the original article here.

Blogs

Neuroinclusion and intersectionality in the workplace

Inclusion is rarely experienced through a single identity, yet much of how organisations approach it still assumes exactly that. A 2026 narrative review by Calvard and colleagues, brings this into sharp focus....
READ POST
Blogs

Rethinking meetings as spaces for inclusion

A 2026 review by Rogelberg and colleagues, synthesises thirty years of research on meeting science and offers a compelling insight. Meetings are not simply operational necessities, they are one of the most influential, and often overlooked, mechanisms through which inclusion is experienced at work....
READ POST
Blogs

Not all expertise is what it seems

A recent paper by Mergen and colleagues (2026), published in Organization, introduces a powerful and timely concept: toxic experts. These are individuals who, despite appearing credible, use their perceived expertise to promote misleading or harmful claims, often for personal or commercial gain....
READ POST

Copyright © 2024 Inclusive Leadership

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply

Web Design by Yellowball