Website Cookies

We use cookies to make your experience better. Learn more on how here

Accept

Board gender diversity, culture, and corporate responsibility: why context matters

In a recent article in the British Journal of Management (Mustafa & Khatri, 2025), researchers examined how cultural values and norms shape the relationship between board gender diversity (BGD) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance. Using data from 5,135 firms in 25 countries over 20 years, they explored two key cultural factors:

  • Harmony vs. mastery orientation – whether a society values fitting in and protecting the welfare of all stakeholders (harmony) or prioritises competitiveness and profit maximisation (mastery).
  • Cultural tightness vs. looseness – the strength and enforcement of social norms, from strict adherence (tight) to greater tolerance for deviation (loose).

Their analysis confirmed that gender-diverse boards tend to improve CSR performance, but this effect is stronger in harmony-oriented cultures and weaker in mastery-oriented ones. The impact is amplified when harmony is combined with cultural tightness, where strong norms reinforce pro-social behaviour. For example, Norway (high harmony, high tightness) showed particularly strong synergy between BGD and CSR outcomes.

Conversely, in mastery cultures – especially tight mastery ones – women directors may be appointed for symbolic reasons, limiting their influence on CSR. The United States (loose mastery) and India (tight mastery) illustrate contexts where the CSR benefits of BGD are less pronounced.

The study also found that in harmony cultures, stronger CSR performance is linked to financial benefits such as higher stock prices, lower costs of debt, and greater market liquidity. This suggests that aligning governance practices with societal values is not only socially beneficial but financially advantageous.

For organisations and policymakers, the implications are clear: efforts to enhance board diversity should be matched with initiatives that strengthen cultural support for social responsibility. In mastery cultures, this may mean emphasising the long-term business case for CSR and embedding diversity in strategic decision-making.

You can access the original article here.

Blogs

10 things to give up to make inclusive leadership not a constant fight but a source of joy!

Being an inclusive leader isn’t easy. It’s emotionally demanding, often lonely, and sometimes feels like swimming against the current. When your job is to challenge bias and make systems fairer, it’s easy to reach a point where you question whether you’re the problem. But you’re not - you’re part of the solution by being a disrupter!...
READ POST
Blogs

Managing insecurity at the top: why inclusion sometimes means managing up

We often assume that power equals confidence. The evidence suggests otherwise.A recent Harvard Business Review article by Jeffrey Polzer and Dritjon Gruda explores a dynamic that many professionals recognise but few openly discuss: managing an insecure boss or colleague....
READ POST
Blogs

The science behind empathetic leadership

Empathy is often described as a ‘soft’ leadership skill. But what does the evidence actually say about its impact at work?...
READ POST

Copyright © 2024 Inclusive Leadership

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply

Web Design by Yellowball