Website Cookies

We use cookies to make your experience better. Learn more on how here

Accept

Inclusion Insights: Who do you imagine when you imagine a ‘star performer’?

According to research by Isabel Villamor and Herman Aguinis published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior, the likelihood is that you imagined a man.

In an extensive research project included three separate studies and 2,322 participants, the researchers explored the concept of star performers, which are defined in the paper as:  “individuals widely and enduringly perceived as possessing rare, desirable qualities through which they can produce exceptional outcomes”.

Traits of a star performer

Building on previous research that shows a concerning star performer gender gap, making it more difficult for women to be recognized as stars, the authors found that star performers are believed to have six characteristics:

  • Driven
  • Relational
  • Extraordinary
  • Fascinating
  • Tenacious
  • Brilliant

Their findings showed that people associated star performers with more masculine than feminine attributes, which they labelled the think star, think men phenomena.

Critically, this finding was context-dependent. The association of stars with masculine attributes was stronger in men-dominated occupations than in women-dominated occupations.

Prototypes bias evaluations

These findings are important as when people evaluate a star performer, they compare that individual to a prototypes (typical features of that category) they implicitly hold in their minds (in this case shown to be Driven, Relational, Extraordinary, Fascinating, Tenacious, Brilliant). In other words, they evaluate the person based on similarity to the prototype rather than the person’s actual behaviour.

The authors argue that to avoid perpetuating the star performer gender gap, individuals must proactively acknowledge and recognize the existence of think star, think men phenomenon. Specifically, individuals in privileged positions must take responsibility for identifying and rectifying gender inequality such as think star, think men.

You can access the original article here.

Blogs

Neuroinclusion and intersectionality in the workplace

Inclusion is rarely experienced through a single identity, yet much of how organisations approach it still assumes exactly that. A 2026 narrative review by Calvard and colleagues, brings this into sharp focus....
READ POST
Blogs

Rethinking meetings as spaces for inclusion

A 2026 review by Rogelberg and colleagues, synthesises thirty years of research on meeting science and offers a compelling insight. Meetings are not simply operational necessities, they are one of the most influential, and often overlooked, mechanisms through which inclusion is experienced at work....
READ POST
Blogs

Not all expertise is what it seems

A recent paper by Mergen and colleagues (2026), published in Organization, introduces a powerful and timely concept: toxic experts. These are individuals who, despite appearing credible, use their perceived expertise to promote misleading or harmful claims, often for personal or commercial gain....
READ POST

Copyright © 2024 Inclusive Leadership

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply

Web Design by Yellowball