Website Cookies

We use cookies to make your experience better. Learn more on how here

Accept

What is holding men back from advancing gender equity at work?

88% of men report wanting to be involved in advancing women at work – so what is stopping them?

In this Harvard Business Review article, Colleen Tolan and Lisa Kaplowitz argue that the key reasons more men don’t get involved is because of fear, ignorance and apathy and therefore to engage more male leaders in the fight for gender equity, these reasons must be addressed. 

Here’s what they suggest needs to happen:

Acknowledge fear – understand the source of the fear.

Men are often afraid of saying the wrong thing. However, “comparatively, there is no evidence of men being fired or physically threatened for speaking up against discrimination”.

To address this, create space for men to have conversations about gender equity without taking it away from women, such as affinity groups.

Addressing ignorance – create opportunities for awareness.

Research suggests that men are worse allies than they think. Part of the issue is that men are unaware that their behaviour is sometimes the source of the problem.

To address this, create opportunities for men to become educated (although don’t place the burden of this education on women) on these issues and ensure that continuous learning (i.e., inquisitiveness) is valued across the organisation.

Overcoming apathy – getting all men to care.

A culture of male engagement means normalising that gender equity is a shared effort among everyone. Sometimes men are apathetic because they don’t think gender equity is their problem.

To address this, men must ensure they frequently express to their male colleagues how much their engagement matters. It is not someone else’s problem.

You can check out the original article here.

Blogs

Neuroinclusion and intersectionality in the workplace

Inclusion is rarely experienced through a single identity, yet much of how organisations approach it still assumes exactly that. A 2026 narrative review by Calvard and colleagues, brings this into sharp focus....
READ POST
Blogs

Rethinking meetings as spaces for inclusion

A 2026 review by Rogelberg and colleagues, synthesises thirty years of research on meeting science and offers a compelling insight. Meetings are not simply operational necessities, they are one of the most influential, and often overlooked, mechanisms through which inclusion is experienced at work....
READ POST
Blogs

Not all expertise is what it seems

A recent paper by Mergen and colleagues (2026), published in Organization, introduces a powerful and timely concept: toxic experts. These are individuals who, despite appearing credible, use their perceived expertise to promote misleading or harmful claims, often for personal or commercial gain....
READ POST

Copyright © 2024 Inclusive Leadership

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply

Web Design by Yellowball